Studies at Iowa State University (ISU) have shown that the nitrogen (N) status of a corn crop can be evaluated by measuring nitrate concentrations in the lower portion of cornstalks at the end of the growing season. This finding led to the development of a new tissue test that can be used to evaluate N management practices. Information in this paper relating to plant sampling and the interpretation of this test has been taken from their publication “Cornstalk Testing to Evaluate Nitrogen Management”, Pm-1584, Aug. 1994.
Studies at ISU concluded that many producers were applying excess N for optimum corn profitability. They further concluded that by using the Pre-Sidedress Soil N Test (PSNT) and the end-of-season cornstalk nitrate test (CSNT), producers could increase their profits by identifying the most profitable N rate for their fields.
According to ISU researchers, the underlying reasons for over-fertilization are that 1) producers tend to fertilize to maintain dark green plants late into the growing season and that 2) corn plants show no visual symptoms of excess N availability. They question the practice of maintaining dark green plants late into the season, because corn leaves tend to lose their deep green color late in the season at economically optimal rates of fertilization. The end-of-season cornstalk test, therefore, helps producers distinguish between fertilizing to maximize greenness and fertilizing to maximize profits.
Existing leaf and grain analysis is better calibrated to identify nutrient shortage, rather than excess. Therefore this test offers a tool that producers and those that advise them may find useful.
The lower portion of a corn stalk tends to function like a reservoir for nitrate N (NO3-N). Corn plants suffering from inadequate N availability tend to remove N from this reservoir, as well as from lower leaves during the grain-filling period. Conversely, corn that has more N than required to achieve top yields based on other existing conditions will tend to accumulate nitrate in their lower stalks at the end of the season.
ISU established relationships between yields and stalk nitrate concentrations in trials having N fertilizer applied at rates ranging from 0 to 300 lb. N/acre. The studies were conducted at many sites over several years to include a wide range of soil, management, and weather conditions.
Calibration studies showed that small increases in rates of fertilization tended to produce one of two kinds of response (see Figure 1).
The first type of response indicates that supplies of available N were limiting plant growth at the end of the season, while the second indicates that supplies of available N were not limiting growth during this period. These response patterns enable a producer to determine if the cop had adequate N late in the growing season.
The results of all trials were combined into a common relationship between stalk nitrate concentrations and relative yields (see Fig. 2). Some relative yields slightly above or below 100 percent should be expected because measured yields tend to differ slightly among plots having ample N.
|Low||less than 250 ppm N|
|Marginal||251-700 ppm N|
|Optimal||701 to 2000 ppm N|
|Excess||greater than 2001 ppm N|
The Low category indicates high probability that greater availability of N would have resulted in higher yields. It should be noted that concentrations in this range give little indication of the magnitude of yield increase that might be expected from more available N. Visual signs of N deficiency usually are clear when nitrate concentrations are in this range.
The Marginal category is where the nitrogen program should be re-evaluated. Visual signs of N deficiency often are observed in this range.
The Optimal category indicates high probability that N availability was within the range needed to maximize profits for the producer. The higher end of this range is more appropriate when fertilizer N is relatively inexpensive and grain prices are relatively high. The lower end of the range is most appropriate when fertilizer N is relatively expensive and grain prices are relatively low.
The Excess category indicates high probability that N availability was greater than if fertilizer N had been applied at rates that maximize profits for producers.
The ISU reports on this research do not discuss in the visual N deficiencies mentioned above in any detail. However, some readers may be lead to assume that visual N deficiency symptoms are not a significant concern. One would have to assume that the visual symptoms mentioned occurred very late in the season, and hopefully near or after black layer development. If this is so, then it would seem likely that the visual deficiency symptoms were not indicative of yield loss. However, if visual deficiency symptoms appeared during or prior to grain-fill, experience indicates that yield loss would be expected.
When using this test, remember that it indicates the “Relative” amount of N uptake by the corn that season. This is important because a Low or Excessive result can have two different meanings.
ISU included the following comments and observations about this test.
Fifteen 8-inch segments should be collected to form a single sample to be sent for analysis. Areas differing in soil types or management histories should be sampled separately. Collecting one composite sample from each of several small areas (less than an acre) that seem to be representative of larger areas within a field is an effective strategy.